Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Spain Study Confirms Hemp Oil Cures Cancer without Side Effects


The International Medical Veritas Association (IMVA) is putting hemp oil on its cancer protocol. It is a prioritized protocol list whose top five items are magnesium chloride, iodine, selenium, Alpha Lipoic Acid and sodium bicarbonate. It makes perfect sense to drop hemp oil right into the middle of this nutritional crossfire of anti cancer medicines, which are all available without prescription.
Hemp oil has long been recognised as one of the most versatile and beneficial substances known to man. Derived from hemp seeds (a member of the achene family of fruits) it has been regarded as a superfood due to its high essential fatty acid content and the unique ratio of omega3 to omega6 and gamma linolenic acid (GLA) – 2:5:1. Hemp oil, is known to contain up to 5% of pure GLA, a much higher concentration than any other plant, even higher than spirulina. For thousands of years, the hemp plant has been used in elixirs and medicinal teas because of its healing properties and now medical science is zeroing in on the properties of its active substances.
Both the commercial legal type of hemp oil and the illegal THC laden hemp oil are one of the most power-packed protein sources available in the plant kingdom. Its oil can be used in many nutritional and transdermal applications. In other chapters in my Winning the War on Cancer book we will discuss in-depth about GLA and cancer and also the interesting work of Dr. Johanna Budwig. She uses flax seed oil instead of hemp oil to cure cancer – through effecting changes in cell walls – using these omega3 and omega6 laden medicinal oils.
Actually there is another way to use medical marijuana without smoking the leaf. According to Dr. Tod H. Mikuriya, “The usual irritating and toxic breakdown products of burning utilized with smoking are totally avoided with vaporization. Extraction and inhaling cannabinoid essential oils below ignition temperature of both crude and refined cannabis products affords significant mitigation of irritation to the oral cavity, and tracheobronchial tree from pyrollytic breakdown products.[iii]
 
Rick Simpson, the man in the documentary below, has been making hemp oil and sharing it with friends and neighbors without charging for it. In small doses, he says, it makes you well without getting you high. “Well you can’t deny your own eyes can you?” Simpson asks. “Here’s someone dying of cancer and they’re not dying anymore. I don’t care if the medicine comes from a tomato plant, potato plant or a hemp plant, if the medicine is safe and helps and works, why not use it?” he asks.
When a person has cancer and is dying this question reaches a critical point. The bravery of Rick Simpson from Canada in showing us how to make hemp oil for ourselves offers many people a hope that should be increasingly appreciated as money dries up for expensive cancer treatments. We are going to need inexpensive medicines in the future and there is nothing better than the ones we can make reasonably cheaply ourselves.
For most people in the world it is illegal so the choice could come down to breaking the law or dying. There is no research to indicate what advantages oral use of hemp oil vs. vaporization but we can assume that advantage would be nutritional with oral intake. Dr. Budwig Below work would sustain this point of view especially for cancer patients.

According to Dr. Robert Ramer and Dr. Burkhard Hinz of the University of Rostock in Germany medical marijuana can be an effective treatment for cancer.[v] Their research was published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute Advance Access on December 25th of 2007 in a paper entitled Inhibition of Cancer Cell Invasion by Cannabinoids via Increased Expression of Tissue Inhibitor of Matrix Metalloproteinases-1.
The biggest contribution of this breakthrough discovery, is that the expression of TIMP-1 was shown to be stimulated by cannabinoid receptor activation and to mediate the anti-invasive effect of cannabinoids. Prior to now the cellular mechanisms underlying this effect were unclear and the relevance of the findings to the behavior of tumor cells in vivo remains to be determined.
Marijuana cuts lung cancer tumor growth in half, a 2007 Harvard Medical School study shows.[vi] The active ingredient in marijuana cuts tumor growth in lung cancer in half and significantly reduces the ability of the cancer to spread, say researchers at Harvard University who tested the chemical in both lab and mouse studies.
This is the first set of experiments to show that the compound, Delta-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), inhibits EGF-induced growth and migration in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expressing non-small cell lung cancer cell lines. Lung cancers that over-express EGFR are usually highly aggressive and resistant to chemotherapy. THC that targets cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 is similar in function to endocannabinoids, which are cannabinoids that are naturally produced in the body and activate these receptors.
“The beauty of this study is that we are showing that a substance of abuse, if used prudently, may offer a new road to therapy against lung cancer,” said Anju Preet, Ph.D., a researcher in the Division of Experimental Medicine. Acting through cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2, endocannabinoids (as well as THC) are thought to play a role in variety of biological functions, including pain and anxiety control, and inflammation.
Researchers reported in the August 15, 2004 issue of Cancer Research, the journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, that marijuana’s constituents inhibited the spread of brain cancer in human tumor biopsies.[vii] In a related development, a research team from the University of South Florida further noted that THC can also selectively inhibit the activation and replication of gamma herpes viruses. The viruses, which can lie dormant for years within white blood cells before becoming active and spreading to other cells, are thought to increase one’s chances of developing cancers such as Kaposi’s Sarcoma, Burkitt’s lymphoma and Hodgkin’s disease.[viii]
In 1998, a research team at Madrid’s Complutense University discovered that THC can selectively induce programmed cell death in brain tumor cells without negatively impacting surrounding healthy cells. Then in 2000, they reported in the journal Nature Medicine that injections of synthetic THC eradicated malignant gliomas (brain tumors) in one-third of treated rats, and prolonged life in another third by six weeks.[ix]
Led by Dr. Manuel Guzman the Spanish team announced they had destroyed incurable brain cancer tumors in rats by injecting them with THC. They reported in the March 2002 issue of “Nature Medicine” that they injected the brains of 45 rats with cancer cells, producing tumors whose presence they confirmed through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). On the 12th day they injected 15 of the rats with THC and 15 with Win-55,212-2 a synthetic compound similar to THC.[x]
Researchers at the University of Milan in Naples, Italy, reported in the Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics that non-psychoactive compounds in marijuana inhibited the growth of glioma cells in a dose-dependent manner, and selectively targeted and killed malignant cells through apoptosis. “Non-psychoactive CBD produce[s] a significant anti-tumor activity both in vitro and in vivo, thus suggesting a possible application of CBD as an antineoplastic agent.”[xi]

The first experiment documenting pot’s anti-tumor effects took place in 1974 at the Medical College of Virginia at the behest of the U.S. government. The results of that study, reported in an Aug. 18, 1974, Washington Post newspaper feature, were that marijuana’s psychoactive component, THC, “slowed the growth of lung cancers, breast cancers and a virus-induced leukemia in laboratory mice, and prolonged their lives by as much as 36 percent.”[xii]
Funded by the National Institute of Health to find evidence that marijuana damages the immune system, found instead that THC slowed the growth of three kinds of cancer in mice — lung and breast cancer, and a virus-induced leukemia. The DEA quickly shut down the Virginia study and all further cannabis/tumor research even though the researchers “found that THC slowed the growth of lung cancers, breast cancers and a virus-induced leukemia in laboratory mice, and prolonged their lives by as much as 36 percent.”
“Antineoplastic Activity of Cannabinoids,” an article in a 1975 Journal of the National Cancer Institute reports, “Lewis lung adenocarcinoma growth was retarded by the oral administration of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabinol (CBN)” — two types of cannabinoids, a family of active components in marijuana. “Mice treated for 20 consecutive days with THC and CBN had reduced primary tumor size.”
Marijuana relieves pain that narcotics like morphine and OxyContin
have hardly any effect on, and could help ease suffering from
illnesses such as multiple sclerosis, diabetes and cancer.[xiii]
According to Devra Davis in her book Secret History of the War on Cancer, 1.5 million lives have been lost because Americans failed to act on existing knowledge about the environmental causes of cancer. It is impossible to calculate the added deaths from suppressed ‘cancer cures’ but we do know of the terrible suffering of hundreds of thousands of people who have been jailed for marijuana use.
Hemp oil with THC included has the making of a primary cancer treatment, which even alone seems to have a great chance of turning the tide against cancer tumors. It has the added advantage of safety, ease of use, lack of side effects and low cost if one makes it oneself. Surrounded by other medicinal anti-cancer substances in a full protocol it’s hard to imagine anyone failing and falling in their war on cancer.
THC should be included in every cancer protocol.
Sodium bicarbonate is another excellent anti tumor substance that reduces tumors but is much more difficult to administer than THC hemp oil. Cannabinoids are able to pass through all barriers in the body like Alpha Lipoic Acid so simple oral intake is sufficient. With bicarbonate we need intravenous applications and often even this is not sufficient, often we have to use catheters and few doctors in the world are willing to administer this way.
In the end all cancer treatments that are not promoted by mainstream oncology are illegal. No licensed doctor is going to claim that are curing cancer with sodium bicarbonate though they will treat people with cancer explaining they are balancing pH or some other metabolic profile with this common emergency room medicine found also most kitchens of the world. More than several states have passed laws making medical marijuana legal but the federal government will not relax and let people be free to choose their treatments even if their lives depend on it.
Davis notes that the cowardice of research scientists, who publish thoroughly referenced reports but pull their punches at the end, by claiming that more research needs to be done before action can be taken. Statements like these are exploited by industry that buys time to make much more money. It is a deliberate attempt that creates wholesale public doubt from small data gaps and remaining scientific uncertainties.
They have done that with everything right up to and including sunlight. Everything is thought to be dangerous except the pharmaceutical drugs which are the most dangerous substances of all. Stomach wrenching chemotherapy and the death principle of radiation are legal yet safe THC laden hemp oil is not.
It is legal for doctors to attack people with their poisons but you can go to jail for trying to save yourself or a loved one from cancer with the oil of a simple garden weed. Our civilization has put up with this insanity but there is a great price being paid. In a mad medical world people die that need not and this is a terrible sadness that has destroyed the integrity and ethics of modern medicine.
The science for the use of hemp oil is credible, specific fact-based, and is documented in detail.[xiv] There is absolutely no reason to not legalize medical marijuana and create an immediate production and distribution of THC hemp oil to cancer patients. Unfortunately we live in a world populated with governments and medical henchmen who would rather see people die cruel deaths then have access to a safe and effect cancer drug.
Meanwhile the Food and Drug Administration approved Genentech’s best-selling drug, Avastin, as a treatment for breast cancer, in a decision, according to the New York Times, “that appeared to lower the threshold somewhat for approval of certain cancer drugs. The big question was whether it was enough for a drug temporarily to stop cancer from worsening — as Avastin had done in a clinical trial — or was it necessary for a drug to enable patients to live longer, which Avastin had failed to do. Oncologists and patient advocates were divided, in part because of the drug’s sometimes severe side effects.”[xv]
The differences between Avastin and hemp oil are huge. First Avastin will earn Genentech hundreds of millions where THC hemp oil will earn no one anything. Second there are no severe or even mild side effects to taking hemp oil and lastly it is not a temporary answer but a real solution. Certainly hemp oil will ensure a longer life.

Swedish Official Admits Toxic ‘Chemtrails’ Are Real, NOT a Wild Conspiracy Theory


Those long, white streams of persistent, cloudy haze commonly blasted into blue skies by unmarked airplanes are not your typical contrails, says Swedish Green Party leader Pernilla Hagberg. As reported by the Swedish paper Katrineholms Kuriren, Hagberg, the first major political leader to come forward on the issue, has openly admitted that these unusual cloud trails, which fail to dissipate like normal contrails do, are actually a toxic mix of chemicals, viruses, and metals that she has collectively referred to as “Chemtrails.”
According to Hagberg, the sprayings are a joint endeavor by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA), as well as the Swedish government in her own country, to modify atmospheric conditions via deliberate aerosol spraying efforts. And included in this “dangerous” mix of aerosols are various chemical components, viruses and viral fragments, and metals such as aluminum and barium, which have already been shown to be accumulating in water supplies and soils around the world. (http://chemtrails.cc/)
Normal contrails, which are composed of mere water vapor that quickly dissipates after emission from jet engines, are far different from chemtrails, which gradually blanket the entire sky in a sea of white. The following video, put together by the FreeTruth Show, a YouTube-based radio broadcast, contains some imagery of what these chemtrails typically look like in the sky:
 “It is great to see a politician bringing public attention to this issue and helping add to the credibility of this cause in the mainstream,” writes JG Vibes for The Intel Hub about Hagberg’s unprecedented public admission. “Unfortunately, this is a political problem that requires many non-political solutions.”
Spraying the skies to save the planet?
Interestingly, the United Nations (UN) and various Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation-backed groups have recently been forced to admit that such sprayings are taking place, and that the emitted particles are not normal contrails. But their excuse for why chemtrail sprayings are being done is that they will somehow save the planet from the devastating effects of so-called “global warming,” that ever-present, pseudoscientific environmental theory that is often used as justification for all sorts of outlandish policy proposals. (http://www.globalresearch.ca)
In the case of chemtrails, everything from blocking the sun in order to lower the earth’s average temperatures, to deliberately shifting weather patterns for the purpose of offsetting the allegedly melting polar ice caps, have been used as excuses for trying to legitimize the seeding of our skies with a cornucopia of poisons. And if re-elected to another term, Hagberg says she will continue to fight such chemtrailing efforts in her own country, which she says have been co-opted by the Swedish government.

Be sure to check out the documentary What in the World are They Spraying? (http://www.whatintheworldaretheyspraying.info/), as well as its sequel, Why in the World are They Spraying? (http://www.whyintheworldaretheyspraying.com/), to learn more about the global chemtrail phenomenon. Both full-length films can also be found for free viewing on YouTube.
Sources for this article include:

Friday, November 23, 2012

Kas ir Eiropas Savienība?

Andris Orols   Cilvēkam, kas ikdienā skatās un klausās  tikai masu mediju piedāvāto un speciāli nemeklē informāciju par to – kas īsti ir Eiropas Savienība, kurā Latvija ir iestājusies pirms dažiem gadiem, šī informācija (iespējams) būs jaunatklājums. Daudzi nezina, ka zināmās aprindās ESV (Eiropas Savienoto Valstu) projekts dzima vienlaicīgi ar ASV projektu, bet to piepildīt izdevās tikai nesen.


Kas ir Eiropas Savienība?
I daļa
2009. gada 6. jūnijā Latvijā notika Eiropas Parlamenta vēlēšanas. Kandidāti, kā nu kurš prazdams, solīja Briselē pārstāvēt Latvijas intereses, proti, kārtot mūsu lietas un vajadzības. Vai jūs kopš tā laika esat par saviem pārstāvjiem Briselē kaut ko dzirdējuši, vai viņi jau sākuši kaut ko kārtot? Tieši ko? Vai kāds, varbūt izņemot Alfrēdu Rubiku, ir atskaitījies par savu darbību? Ko viņi vispār tur dara?
2008. gada 8. maijā Latvijas Saeima bez debatēm un gandrīz vienbalsīgi ratificēja Lisabonas līgumu, kurš stājās spēkā 2009. gada 1. decembrī. Vai kāds, ieskaitot deputātus, kuri par to balsoja, ir šo līgumu vispār pilnībā izlasījis un var saprotami paskaidrot, kādas saistības Latvija ir uzņēmusies vai kādas tiesības šis līgums mums devis? Vai kādam vispār ir kaut aptuvens priekšstats par to, kas ir Lisabonas līgums, vai kāds ir ar to saistīto dokumentu kopumu kaut rokā paturējis vai redzējis saliktu vienā plauktā?
Vai jūs zināt, ka Eiropas Savienībai ir prezidents? Nu jā, tas pats pelēkais vīriņš, kas mazliet līdzīgs mūsu Augustam Kirhenšteinam 1940. gadā. Atšķirība vien tā, ka Kirhenšteins tomēr bija zinātnieks – mikrobioloģijas pamatlicējs, bet kas ir ES prezidents Hermans van Rumpejs?
hrHermans van Rumpejs
Augusts Kirhenšteins
Kas un kāpēc Rumpeju ievēlēja vai iecēla? Kādi ir Rumpeja pasaules uzskati, līdzšinējie sasniegumi un nākotnes plāni? Kas un kāpēc izvēlējās tieši viņu, bet ne citu kandidātu?
Starp citu, Eiropas Savienībai nu ir arī sava ārlietu ministre – Katrīna Eštone. Kas viņa ir, kas un kāpēc viņu iecēla? To nezina atbildēt pat 99% Lielbritānijas iedzīvotāju, no kuriem šī lēdija cēlusies. Bet viņa taču ir arī MŪSU ārlietu ministre, viņa pasaulē pārstāv arī mūs!
Labi, nebūsim tik bargi tikai pret ārzemniekiem. Ko mēs kā latvieši varam pateikt par latviskas izcelsmes ES komisāru Andri Piebalgu (skat. attēlu)?
Andris Piebalgs
Izņemot to, ka viņš zināmos laika periodos ir „ieņēmis amatu”? Piemēram, viņš bija Latvijas finanšu ministrs laikā, kad sabruka Banka Baltija un pārējās noguldījumu piramīdas. Kāda bija viņa nostāja un rīcība? – Nekāda. Kādas bija viņa iniciatīvas, iepriekš ieņemot izglītības ministra amatu? – Nekādas! Absolūta nulle un reti sastopama pelēcība! Kopš tā laika viņš paguvis ieņemt ES enerģētikas komisāra amatu, bet nu ir jau ES attīstības sadarbības komisārs. Vai beidzot Piebalgs sācis izrādīt kādu iniciatīvu? Spriediet paši.
Un ar līdzīgiem rezultātiem varam mēģināt izsekot katram ES politiķim vai ierēdnim. Tās ir kā ēnas vai runājošas galvas, kuras šad tad tiek pieslēgtas mēdiju kanāliem, lai pateiktu pāris vispārējus teikumus. Bet viņus kāds izvēlas un ieceļ. Kas un kāpēc?
– Atbildes netiek dotas. Bet tikmēr jau izskanējuši paziņojumi, ka Eiropas Savienība veidos vienotu armiju, vienotu izlūkdienestu, vienotu tiesu utt. Ar ko šī armija karos, ko izspiegos vienotais izlūkdienests, ko un par ko tiesās? Kāpēc viss ietīts noslēpumā? Kas vispār ir Eiropas Savienība un kāpēc arī mēs tajā esam iekļauti?
Senie simboli un melnie uzvalki
Ja ir tik daudz pelēkas noslēpumainības un miglainas nenoteiktības, tad jājautā – kas un kādēļ tiek slēpts? Un tas jau paver plašu lauku sazvērestības teorijām. „Sazvērēties” nozīmē – slepeni vienoties. Piemēram, Hitlers slepeni vienojās ar Staļinu par ietekmes sfēru sadalīšanu Eiropā, otrās Godmaņa valdības pārstāvji slepeni vienojās ar Parex bankas vadību par šīs bankas nacionalizāciju, tās parādu uzkraušanu visai valstij, ietekmīgāko anonīmo noguldītāju glābšanu, dāsnām kompensācijām bankas izsaimniekotājiem un šā visa darījuma paturēšanu slepenībā. Ar sazvērestībām ir pilna visa vēsture un arī mūsu ikdiena. Sazvērestības nepatīk tikai pelēkiem ierēdņiem, kuri ir cītīgākie sazvērestību slēpēji. Sevišķi jau tas attiecināms uz Eiropu, kuras vēsture pārpilna ar pasaules iekarošanas plāniem, sākot jau ar Maķedonijas Aleksandru, Romas impēriju, Svēto Romas impēriju, krusta kariem, Napoleona plāniem, Hitlera jaunās pasaules kārtības plānu u.c. Tieši Eiropā sākās divi un pagaidām vienīgie pasaules kari, kas notika pavisam nesen. Un katram pasaules iekarotājam piemīt vājība aiz sevis atstāt pēdas: leģendas, pieminekļus, simbolus. Un šie simboli tiek pārmantoti, pārņemti, sargāti, it kā tiem piemistu sakrāls spēks un iespēja caur tiem gūt varu un kontroli pār citiem. Lielākie simbolu sargātāji ir Eiropas aristokrātija, kas arvien saglabājusies, neraugoties uz vairākām demokrātiska rakstura reformām un revolūcijām.
Savukārt aiz katra simbola ir reliģiski kulti un slepenas biedrības, kas šos kultus piekopj un nodod mantojumā nākamām paaudzēm. Tā kā Eiropas civilizācija izveidojās salīdzinoši nesen, tad reliģiskos kultus tā pārņēma galvenokārt no vidējo austrumu civilizācijām: jūdiem, Ēģiptes, Babilonijas. Tieši Babilonijas (šumēru) kulti ir vissenākie, ar tiem saistītas daudzas leģendas, kuras vēlāk pārņēma senie ēģiptieši un arī jūdi. Eiropā šos kultus ieveda sākotnēji grieķi, bet vēlāk un pamatīgāk – Romas impērija. Tāpēc tieši Romu – pilsētu uz septiņiem kalniem – dēvē par jauno Babilonu.
Arī kristietība ir cēlusies no vidējiem austrumiem, un imperatora Konstantīna laikā šo tautas garīgo kustību, kas balstījās uz Jēzus mācību, ierāmēja ciešos Babilonas mistēriju kultu rāmjos. Tāpēc nenākas brīnīties, ka gan senie kristiešu dievnami, gan visas senās Eiropas pilsētas ir pārpilnas ar senajiem babiloniešu kulta simboliem: pagānu obeliskiem, īpatnējām celtnēm, mitoloģiskiem dzīvniekiem augstmaņu heraldikā, valstu un pilsētu ģerboņos u.c. Faktiski Konstantīna dibinātā Romas baznīca pārņēma visus parastajiem cilvēkiem domātos pagānu svētkus, kultus, simbolus un rituālus, tikai pagānu dievību vietā liekot baznīcas svētos. Formāli Romas baznīca pārņēma arī Jēzus mācību, taču pati visbiežāk rīkojās pretēji šai mācībai. Tāpēc varam runāt par divām kristietībām: Jēzus sludināto un Konstantīna kristietību. Ja pirmā ir mīloša, tad otrā – impēriska, alkatīga un asiņaina. Konstantīna baznīca no pagāniem pārņēma arī trīsvienīga Dieva ideju: Tēvs, Dēls un Svētais gars. Dievu triādes pazīstamas praktiski visos pagānu kultos, piemēram, ēģiptiešu triāde: Hors, Ozīriss un Izīda, latviešu – Dievs, Laima un Māra.
Viens no senākajiem mītiem, kas atspoguļots arī jūdu un kristiešu svētajos rakstos ir mīts par Bābeles torni. Lūk, tā attēls, bet tam blakus … Eiropas Parlamenta ēka Strasbūrā un stilizēts (sapludināts no diviem) jaunā Bābeles torņa attēlojums.
bab
Stāstu par Bābeles torni un tā celšanas mērķiem, lūdzu, izlasiet paši.
Bet vai jūs zināt, kā radās Eiropas nosaukums?
Tam pirmsākumi meklējami grieķu mitoloģijā. Feniķiešu ķēniņam Tīram bija ļoti skaita meita vārdā Eiropa (vienlaikus arī pagānu dieviete), kuru bija iekārojis ietekmīgs dievs vārdā Zevs. Zevs nolēma iekāroto skaistuli nolaupīt. Šim nolūkam viņš pārvērtās par neparastas krāsas bulli. Kad Eiropa aiz ziņkāres uzsēdās uz šā dīvainā buļļa, tas pēkšņi metās jūrā un meiteni aizveda uz Krētas salu, kuras krastā bullis atkal pārvērtās par dievu Zevu. Šo leģendu sauc par „Eiropas nolaupīšanu”. Jā, tikai iztēlojaties – EIROPAS NOLAUPĪŠANU! Vai vēsture nav atkārtojusies?
Bet tagad apskatīsimies šo simbolu saistībā ar Eiropas Savienības pārvaldi. No kreisās puses pirmajā attēlā redzama stilizēta Eiropa uz buļļa pašā ES pārvaldes sirdī Briselē, otrajā – pie t.s. Vinstona Čērčila nama, tālāk – dažādos propagandas izdevumos, uz ES naudas, telefona kartē un citur. Iepriekšpēdējā attēlā redzami ES komisāri melnos uzvalkos, kas tīksminās par savu Eiropas nolaupīšanas simbolu.
ees
Bet pēdējais attēls labajā pusē ir jau no citas leģendas – Atklāsmes grāmatas Jaunajā derībā. 17. nodaļā rakstīts:
“Viens no tiem septiņiem eņģeļiem, kuriem bija septiņi kausi, nāca un sacīja man tā: “Nāc, es tev rādīšu, kādu sodu saņem lielā netikle, kas sēd pie lielajiem ūdeņiem. Pasaules ķēniņi dzīvojuši ar viņu netiklībā, un zemes iedzīvotāji apreibinājušies ar viņas netiklības vīnu.”
Un viņš garā aiznesa mani tuksnesī. Tur es redzēju sievu sēžam uz sarkana zvēra, kas bija pilns zaimu vārdu; tam bija septiņas galvas un desmit ragi. Sieva bija tērpta purpurā un sarkanā audumā, greznojusies ar zeltu, dārgiem akmeņiem un pērlēm; tai rokā bija zelta kauss, pilns ar bezdievības negantībām un viņas netiklības netīrumiem.
Uz viņas pieres bija rakstīts noslēpumains vārds: lielā Bābele, visas zemes netikļu un negantību māte. Es redzēju: sieva bija piedzērusies no svēto asinīm un no Jēzus liecinieku asinīm. Viņu redzēdams, es varen izbrīnījos.
Eņģelis man sacīja: “Kāpēc tu esi tā izbrīnījies? Es tev pateikšu, kas ir šis sievas noslēpums un zvēra ar septiņām galvām un desmit ragiem noslēpums, kas nes sievu.
Zvērs, ko tu redzēji, bija, tā tagad vairs nav; bet tas izkāps no bezdibeņa un ies bojā; tad zemes iedzīvotāji, kuru vārdi nav rakstīti dzīvības grāmatā no pasaules iesākuma, brīnīsies, redzēdami zvēru, kas bijis, bet kura tagad nav un kas atkal būs.
Šeit vajag gudrības, lai saprastu: septiņas galvas ir septiņi kalni, uz kuriem sēd sieva;
tās ir arī septiņi ķēniņi: pieci ir krituši, viens ir tagad, viens vēl nav atnācis; un, kad tas nāks, tam būs palikt tikai īsu brīdi. Zvērs, kas bijis un kura tagad nav, tas pats ir astotais, tomēr viens no septiņiem, un aiziet bojā. Un desmit ragi, ko tu redzēji, ir desmit ķēniņi, tie valdību vēl nav saņēmuši, bet tiem ir ķēniņa vara dota kopā ar zvēru vienu stundu.
Tie ir vienisprātis un nodod savu spēku un varu zvēram. Tie karos ar Jēru, bet Jērs tos uzvarēs, jo Viņš ir kungu Kungs un ķēniņu Ķēniņš, un Viņa aicinātie, izredzētie un uzticīgie, kas ir līdz ar Viņu.”
Tad viņš man saka: “Ūdeņi, ko tu redzēji, pie kuriem sēd netikle, ir tautas un ļaužu pulki, ciltis un valodas. Un desmit ragi, ko tu redzēji, un zvērs – tie ienīdīs netikli, to atstās postam un izģērbs kailu, ēdīs viņas miesas un viņu pašu sadedzinās ar uguni.
Jo Dievs ir devis viņu sirdīs darīt Viņa gribu, darīt vienu nodomu un nodot savu valstību zvēram, kamēr piepildīsies Dieva vārdi. Un sieva, ko tu redzēji, ir lielā pilsēta, kam pieder valdība pār visas zemes ķēniņiem.”

Eiropas Savienības karogs ir 12 zeltainas zvaigznes, kas izvietotas aplī uz tumši zila fona. Arī tas ir sens simbols: 12 Izraēļa ciltis, 12 pravieši, 12 mācekļi, 12 dārgakmeņi uz virspriestera krūtīm, 12 stundas dienā, 12 mēneši gadā, 12 horoskopa zīmes utt. 12 zvaigznes redzamas arī ap pagānu dievietēm un pat Svētās jaunavas Marijas oreolā, kur tas nonāca imperatora Konstantīna, kurš bija saules dieva pielūdzējs, dibinātās katoļu baznīcas ietekmē. Lūk, daži raksturīgi attēli ar simboliskajām 12 zvaigznēm:
jm
Iepriekšpēdējais attēls bija oficiāls Eiropas Parlamenta vēlēšanu propagandas plakāts, kurš sludināja: „Daudz valodu, viena balss!” Pēdējais ir ES pretinieku plakāts, kas simbolizē totalitāro varu maiņu Eiropā: no Hitlera un Staļina līdz Eiropas Savienībai.
Tā kā ES patieso veidotāju plāni sniedzas tālu pār Eiropas kontinenta robežām, tad viņi kategoriski atteicās par savienības simbolu izvēlēties paneiropas kustības emblēmu – sarkanu krustu dzeltenā aplī, kā arī atteicās konstitucionālos dokumentos ierakstīt, ka tā ir kristīgu valstu savienība. Paneiropas kustību I pasaules kara laikā dibināja Rietumeiropas aristokrāti ar Habsburgu dinastiju priekšgalā. Iesaistīto aristokrātisko ģimeņu saknes stiepjas dziļā senatnē – Svētajā Romas impērijā un Romas impērijā, bet, iespējams, ka vēl tālāk. Jau tagad zināmi plāni ES impērijas robežas paplašināt vismaz līdz senajām Romas impērijas robežām, iekļaujot arī bijušās provinces, sākot ar mūsdienu Turciju un Izraēlu.
Par ES himnu izvēlēta tēma no Bēthovena 9. simfonijas pēdējās daļas prelūdijas – „Oda priekam”. Oriģinālā tās vārdu autors bija Fridrihs Šillers. Vārdos attēlota ļaužu saplūšana pagānu dievietes templī un apvienošanos brālībā, kas balstīta uz šīs dievietes maģisko spēku. Te, lūk, Šillera dzejas oriģināla pirmās rindas:
O Freunde, nicht diese Toene!
Sondern lasst uns angenehmere anstimmen und freundenvollere!
Freude, schoener Goetterfunken,
Tochter aus Elysium,
Wir betreten feuertrunken,
Himmlische dein Heiligtum.
Deine Zauber binden wieder,
Was die Mode streng geteilt;
Alle Menschen werden Brueder,
Wo dein sanfter Fluegel weilt.
Wem der grosse Wurf gelungen,
Eines Freundes Freund zu sein,
Wer ein holdes Weib errungen,
Mische seine Jubel ein!
Eiropas diena tiek svinēta 9. maijā. Tā ir diena, kurā 1950. gadā Francijas ārlietu ministrs Roberts Šūmans teica tālejošus vārdus, aicinot Franciju, Vāciju un citas Rietumeiropas valstis apvienot savu ogļu un tērauda rūpniecību, lai „ liktu pirmo betona akmeni Eiropas federācijas pamatos”. Tātad jau 1950. gadā runa nebija par neatkarīgu valstu savienību, bet gan par unitāru veidojumu. Šo būtisko akcentu gan Eiropas politiķi ilgu laiku centās neuzsvērt, lai priekšlaikus neatbaidītu iekļaušanai ES paredzētās tautas.
Viens no spilgtākajiem ES simboliem, protams, ir kopējā valūta eiro. Arī šīs valūtas pakāpeniska ieviešana liecina par plāniem izveidot unitāru federāciju, nevis valstu savienību. Jo sava valūta ir viens no svarīgākajiem valsts pārvaldes instrumentiem un suverenitātes pazīmēm. Pagaidām eiro iztrūkst vairāku īstas valūtas īpašību, jo vēl nepastāv vienots budžets, nav vienotas nodokļu sistēmas, un vienas dalībvalsts parādi nekļūst par visas ES parādiem. Taču, iespējams, šos trūkumus paredzēts novērst, izmantojot patreizējo globālo finanšu sabrukumu. Kad t.s. PIIGS (Portugāle, Īrija, Itālija, Grieķija un Spānija) un HELL valstis tiks novestas neciešami katastrofālā stāvoklī, iespējams, tām tiks piedāvāts šāds impērisks risinājums. Aplūkosim dažus ES naudas paraugus. Pats Eiro simbols € redzams iepriekšējā attēlu galerijā – kā piemineklis pie Eiropas Centrālās bankas ēkas.
mm
mm
ES vēsture: pakāpeniska varas centralizācija
Sabiedrība kopumā jeb t.s. parastie cilvēki absolūti nemācās pat no savām kļūdām un tiem ir apbrīnojami īsa atmiņa. To veicina arī mūsu izglītības sistēma, kas skolniekus atstāj neziņā par elementārām valsts pārvaldes likumsakarībām un patieso tautas vēsturi. Piemēram, 1990. gadu sākumā E. Repšes un I. Godmaņa vadībā diezgan turīgā Latvijas sabiedrība tika nekaunīgi aplaupīta. 1990. gadu vidū to pašu aprindu vadībā daudzus vēl maksātspējīgos papildus aplaupīja Banka Baltija un citi noguldījumu piramīdas dalībnieki. Tas viss radīja priekšnoteikumus Latvijas iekļaušanai ES, šo savienību pasniedzot kā glābiņu un nākotnes pārticības garantu. Un šajā konfigurācijā cilvēkus aplaupīja vēlreiz, daudzus padarot par bezcerīgiem parādu vergiem. Nu jau to paveica t.s. Eiropas bankas. Bet daudzi arvien vēl nav neko sapratuši, un atkal glābiņu meklē tajos pašos funkcionāros: I Godmanī un E. Repšē, ar kuriem šī aplaupīšanas spēle sākās. Protams, ne jau Repše un Godmanis ir tie īstenie noteicēji. Viņi paši ir parādnieki un tikai bandinieki (melnie vai svītrainie uzvalciņi) daudz nopietnāku manipulatoru rokās. Velkot paralēles ar nesen latviski izdoto Džona Perkinsa grāmatu „Ekonomiskā slepkavas grēksūdze”, Repše un Godmanis ir tipiskākie Latvijas ekonomikas slepkavas.
Aristokrātija tieši tāpēc ir aristokrātija, ka viņi mācās un savas zināšanas nodod no paaudzes uz paaudzi. Aristokrātisko dinastiju jeb namu saknes var izsekot cauri gadsimtiem un pat gadu tūkstošiem. Viņi (jeb viņu pēcteči) arvien ir šeit, vien savu ietekmi īsteno caur pērkamiem politiķiem, ierēdņiem un citiem funkcionāriem, kurus esmu nosaucis par „melnajiem uzvalkiem”. Pēc Svētās Romas impērijas iziršanas par pirmo Eiropas nozadzēju var uzskatīt Rotšildu namu. 1743. gadā Vācijā dzimušais augļotājs Meiers Amšels Rotšilds (dzimis Bauers) savus dēlus ar naudu izsūtīja uz tā laikā svarīgāko Eiropas lielvalstu galvaspilsētām – uz Franciju, Itāliju, Angliju un Austriju. Caur Angliju Rotšildu intereses iespiedās arī Ziemeļamerikas kolonijās, kas vēlāk kļuva par ASV. Finansējot karaļus un viņu karus (abas puses), finansējot revolūcijas un apvērsumus, ieprecoties citās bagātu aristokrātu dzimtās, Rotšildi pakāpeniski Eiropā izveidoja vienotu banku sistēmu, kas darbojās pāri valstu robežām un kuru kontrolēja Rotšildu nams, ko pieņemts saukt arī par Rotšildu ģimenes starptautisko banku dinastiju. 1790. gadā Rotšilds aristokrātu vidū izteica savu leģendāro atziņu: „Ļaujiet man kontrolēt nācijas naudu, un man vienalga, kas raksta šīs nācijas likumus.” Rotšildu banku dinastija savu ietekmi nav zaudējusi arī mūsdienās, varat kaut tūlīt ienākt tās atturīgi veidotajā interneta vietnē http://www.rothschild.com. Taču īsti aristokrāti sevi īpaši nereklamē, viņu uzvārdus neatradīsiet „Forbes” bagātāko miljardieru sarakstos, viņi reti sniedz intervijas, viņi darbojas caur saviem aģentiem un uzticības personām. Viņi ir tie, kas ar citu rokām rausta aukliņas globālajā leļļu izrādē. Un Eiropas Savienība šajā izrādē ir galvenā varas koncentrēšanas eksperimenta laboratorija, pēc kuras vadlīnijām plānots ieviest kontroli pār visu pasauli. Tieši šis varas centralizācijas process tad arī ir tik bieži piesauktā globalizācija.
Bijušā ASV prezidenta Bila Klintona skolotājs, Džordžtaunas universitātes profesors Dr. Kerols Kviglijs (Carroll Quigley) grāmatā „Traģēdija un cerība” rakstīja:
„Starptautisko baņķieru mērķis ir radīt tādu pasaules finanšu kontroles sistēmu, kas dominētu katras valsts politisko sistēmu un pasaules ekonomiku kopumā. Šo privāti veidoto sistēmu paredzēts pārvaldīt feodālā kārtībā, izmantojot centrālās bankas, kuras darbosies saskaņoti un balstoties uz slepenu vienošanos. Starptautisko baņķieru būtība nav rase, reliģija vai tautība, bet tikai kaislīga vēlme kontrolēt citus cilvēkus.”
Pirmais Eiropas mēroga pasākums kopš Svētās Romas impērijas iziršanas bija Napoleona karš (Napoleons pie varas nonāca caur to pašu Rotšildu finansēto franču revolūciju), kurā Rotšildi, protams, finansēja abas puses, un kura laikā, izmantojot viltību un dezinformāciju, Rotšildiem izdevās savām interesēm pilnīgi pakļaut visu Anglijas naudas sistēmu. Kopš tā laika tieši Rotšildu dominētā Anglijas banka ieguva tiesības emitēt Anglijas naudu, kuru britu valdība bija spiesta uz procentiem aizņemties no šīs privātās institūcijas. Britu impērijai aptverot visu zemeslodi, tieši Londona (lasi Rotšildu nams) kļuva par galveno pasaules finanšu centru.
Protams, bez Rotšildiem darbojās arī citas aristokrātiskas dinastijas, kuras kontrolēja tā laika impērijas. Piemēram, Austrijas impērijā liela ietekme bija Habsburgiem, kuru pēcteči XX gadsimtā organizēja ES priekšteci – paneiropas kustību.
Eiropas nozagšanas laukā darbojās daudzi. Piemēram, boļševiks V. I. Ļeņins, kurs ilgus gadus pavadīja Rietumeiropas trimdā, uzrakstīja grāmatu, kas veltīta „Eiropas Savienoto Valstu” radīšanas nepieciešamībai. Un viņam bija savs plāns. Par Romas impērijas atdzimšanu sapņoja arī bijušais sociālists un itāļu fašisma pamatlicējs B. Musolīni. Taču viņu apsteidza Ā. Hitlers, kura pasludinātais mērķis bija „jaunā pasaules kārtība” un arī „jaunā Eiropa”. Par laimi, šie plāni neīstenojās, jo rupjš militārs spēks rada atbilstošu un nekavējošu pretestību.
Eiropas aristokrātija ķērās pie nākamā savas varas konsolidācijas posma. Napoleons, Ļeņins, Hitlers, visas revolūcijas un apvērsumi bija tikai pirmā stadija spēlē, kuru sauc „problēma – reakcija – risinājums”. Tātad paši aristokrāti, atbalstot tādus maniakus kā Hitlers vai Staļins, rada problēmu. Problēma izraisa reakciju – pasaules karu. Rezultātā Eiropas valstis tiek izpostītas un izkautas, tautas un cilvēki noguruši no nebeidzamiem kariem, apvērsumiem un revolūcijām. Un tieši tajā brīdī citi tos pašu aristokrātu atbalstītie funkcionāri piedāvā risinājumu: lai vairs nebūtu karu, mums jāveido savienība.
Jānis Kučinskis
Pārpublicējums no: http://www.tautasforums.lv/?p=1608

Monday, November 19, 2012

Ke$ha’s Performance at X Factor Australia: In Your Face Illuminati Symbolism

It’s been pretty much established since day one that Ke-dollarsign-ha is an industry pawn. Well, she’s apparently not done pawning it up. Her recent performance at X Factor Australia is basically one big tribute to the Illuminati. The symbol of the all-seeing eye within a triangle couldn’t be more in your face – it is even on dancer’s clothes. If we’re not seeing that symbol, a bunch of spinning pentagrams are there to hypnotize viewers.
And isn’t weird that she repeats ”we’re gonna die young” about 20 times in the song?
Here’s the performance.

Wednesday, November 14, 2012

7 Elephants Now Thrashing Your Living Room



According to the mass media fog machine, the following phenomena are really not worth reporting. In fact, by their omission they literally do not fully exist in people’s minds but are just slight vague ephemeral illusions dancing on the fringe of their consciousness.
As many people say to this day, “if 9/11 was an inside job the media would have been all over it.”
Conditioning complete.

Here They Come…Just 7 Of The Herd for Starters

1. Fukushima Is Irradiating the Planet

Estimated to have already far surpassed Chernobyl in dangerous radioactive emissions that are not abating in the least and expected to get worse, we hear nothing about this in the mainstream news.
In fact, the level of denial is outright Orwellian. Here’s a perfect example in recent news:

Nuke agency reports unusual radiation in Europe

VIENNA (AP) — Very low levels of radiation, which are higher than normal but don’t seem to pose a health hazard, are being registered in the Czech Republic and elsewhere in Europe, the International Atomic Energy Agency said Friday.
The agency said the cause was not known but was not the result of Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, which spread radiation across the globe in March. Source
Go ahead and rub your eyes, but you actually just read that. In fact in Japan the denial is so great that people are moving BACK to Fukushima and eating the contaminated food while children play in its highly toxic playgrounds.
All part of the same message; “The elephant doesn’t exist.”

2. Illegal Drone Attacks are Terrorizing Innocent Populations

Be sure to click on the BBC link at the bottom of this quote for a glimpse into a terrorized teen’s last words before he was beheaded by a drone attack while driving his car with his cousin who was also murdered.

The human toll of the US drone campaign

The principal reason so little attention is paid to the constant victims of American violence in the Muslim world is because the U.S. Government refuses to disclose anything about these attacks and media outlets virtually never report on those victims (MSNBC demoted and then fired its then-rising-star Ashleigh Banfield when she returned from Iraq and pointed out that fact in an April, 2003 speech denouncing the “one-sided” coverage of American wars: meaning, the invisibility in U.S. media of America’s civilian victims). It’s easy to cheer for a leader who regularly extinguishes the lives of innocent men, women, teenagers and young children when you can remain blissfully free of hearing about the victims. It’s even easier when the victims all have Muslim-ish names and live in the parts of the Muslim world we’ve been taught to view as a cauldron of sub-human demons. That’s why it’s periodically worth highlighting the actual impact of those drones and the actual people they kill, as the BBC did today:
Source

3. Geoengineering and Weather Wars

The amount of documentation and evidence supporting the existence of these ongoing programs is staggering, yet never a word in the mainstream press. All you hear about is more hype regarding “climate change problems” and the scientific community’s “concern” and ideas for “mitigating this problem”, where they slowly introduce weather mod “ideas” that are actually black ops programs already under way for years.
That the UN had to pass a treaty to NOT use weather weapons as far back as 1977 says it all. Where do you think they are with that technology now, 34 years later?
Wikepedia: Weather control, particularly hostile weather warfare, was addressed by the “United Nations General Assembly Resolution 31/72, TIAS 9614 Convention[19] on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques” was adopted. The Convention was: Signed in Geneva May 18, 1977; Entered into force October 5, 1978; Ratification by U.S. President December 13, 1979; U.S. ratification deposited at New York January 17, 1980. [20]
With earthquakes and storm systems demonstrably proven to be manipulated or outright caused by powerful EMF manipulation and our skies constantly streaked with a chemical haze emitted by 1000′s of planes worldwide one might think there would be cause for alarm and a little public education.
“Nope, no elephant here….cuz we don’t even talk about it.”

4. The Obama Hoax

Now this one you may think is obvious but it’s a doozy. Here’s a guy who came out of nowhere and they can’t even find anyone who knew him where he claimed to go to college. He produces no paperwork on his nationality, education or health records, has multiple social security numbers and whose only credentials are a book by himself about himself! ..and of which he is very likely not even the author!
And the contents of the book? How much is true and how much is just made up and cleverly packaged? At least with a food package you get a contents list. This fable rivals a Disney production.
He comes in on a hope and change anti-war ticket and what does he do? The same as the rest of them and no one seems to notice!
He escalates America’s illegal wars and wins the Nobel Peace Prize. He promises transparency and we know less about the government’s goings on than ever. And he has devolved the US government into a defacto fascist dictatorship with his use of Czar appointments, executive orders and arbitrary war forays without Congressional approval.
And he’s President of the United States! Not only that, he has presided (as figurehead) over the worst downturn in American history and is now running for re-election based on his amazing record of accomplishments!
“No elephant here. He’s hope and change! More smoke up my butt please…”

5. Universal Sickcare

This is business as usual for the PTBs but it’s still a giant stomping elephant in every room of the house.
When organic food and supplements are on the verge of being banned, growing your own food regulated and hindered, and the Federal Drug Administration approves poisonous toxins in your food and water and the genetic modification of living organisms that we consume but have no right to know which ones they are…we have a problem.
When our children are being drugged and vaccinated, and given a steady diet of junk food laden with MSG, aspartame, wood pulp and genetically modified high fructose corn syrup, just to name a few of their poisons…we have a problem.
When doctors won’t treat unvaccinated patients, chemotherapy becomes mandatory and natural and homeopathic treatments are illegal…we have a problem.
It’s not a healthcare system. It’s sick, and promotes sickness. Hey, don’t believe me? Follow the money. Cui bono?

6. Media Magick Madness

That they can get away with camouflaging and ignoring and getting the public to ignore major issues such as these is akin to magick or sorcery. They do this by,amongst other things, introducing subconscious rules and guidelines as to what we should consider truth or not. And one of the rules is, “if we the media mogul mouthpieces don’t talk about it, it might as well not exist because we don’t consider it important”.

Truth erased by omission and supplanted with a false narrative.

The perfect example again is 9/11. There’s not an iota of the official story that is provable except that things blew up, while the anomalies in what transpired that day are myriad. And is this even debatable? No. In fact even challenging the official story has become tantamount to heresy. After all, rule #1 is to NEVER point out an elephant. Elephants simply do not exist.
That kerosene can’t melt steel? Sorry, never heard that on TV. That an Arab passport flutters supernaturally in perfect condition from this horrific exploding plane hitting and supposedly melting an entire building? Wow, what luck!
And the pancake theory? Anyone see any pancaked floors? “Oh well, I’m sure they were there cuz they told us that’s how it happened, move along.” And to this day mention building 7 and you’ll be shocked how many people never even heard of it.
Why? The old news blackout trick. Do the same with Oklahoma City…review what was on the news the first day and notice how you never ever heard again about “the other bombs” they found that day that were sophisticated military grade munitions. The reporters said these were crucial evidence and were going to help identify the culprits.
Gone. Erased by omission from the public mind. Virtually the “lone gunman” story once again. JFK redux. How convenient.
Besides the lies and political side show, when the populace is bombarded with shallow roll models, decadent athletes and rock stars, degrading sexual deviancy and an endless stream of horrific violent images via TV, movies, computer games and even actual war…we have a problem.

7. Marginalization Of Extra “Ordinary” Phenomena

What UFOs? 10′s of thousands of sightings doesn’t apparently mean squat if “official sources” don’t acknowledge their existence. A secret space program and mega militarization of space? “C’mon, they couldn’t hide something like that! And underground bases? That would be such a story the media would never ignore and surely someone would have spoken up about them.”
Mind control? “Now who would do that to you but a demonic Asian in a POW camp? Get over it. It’s not possible any more. I’m a free entity, there’s no way they could pull that off. Pass the cool aid, honey, I’m thirsty..”
Funny, they talk about the technological capability to do things like these, and put out scores of movies on these subjects, but in order to apply it to your reality they’ve positioned themselves as the final authority on every subject. For example, that the wicked PTBs may be targeting the general population with mind control techniques, never mind manipulating thousands of actual Manchurian candidates around the world would seem crazy to most. Yet they know advertising works on this very basis.
But again, that’s been cleverly camouflaged, excused and justified as “free enterprise”. Clever little bastards, aren’t they?
“And now those wackos are talking about secret societies? All that stuff’s nonsense. Why the news man would laugh at all that, honey. I could tell by the smirk on his face not to believe all that stuff…”
And consciousness and extra-dimensional realities? That’s relegated to “scientists” to package up and serve in some remote non-applicable sanitized fashion. Otherwise, you talk about that stuff and you’re a new age paranoid conspiracy nut job.
Again, the false choice technique…neither option they give you is the Truth.

Conclusion

These are just 7 of these things. There is an entire herd of elephants running around the whole human household with more roaming through each day! The extent to which humanity is being massively manipulated can be overwhelming at first, but it’s actually quite liberating once you get through most of the maze and start to “get it”.
But this is real education. The other is predominantly programming your mind to accept a predetermined version of reality that they would like you to have.
Solution: Pull the Plug
It’s clear the so-called government and it’s plethora of bloated agencies are not there to help you, but to manage, seduce, suppress, subjugate and control you. Yet they convince you otherwise to keep you dependent and upside down and backwards while telling you everything’s on the up and up.
Their fundamental technique is trauma-based mind control and cognitive dissonance. Keep affronting your senses with violent images and then reversing your sense of right and wrong and telling you white is black and black is white long enough and you’ll finally give in.
The only place to turn is OFF. Turn it all off. Get your real life back. Read, play, love those around you, laugh, visit inspiring and revelatory alternative internet sites while they’re still available. Spend time in nature. Just get away from televisions and any form of mass media. Have you noticed how TVs are constantly playing in just about every lobby, restaurant, lounge, terminal etc., and people leave them on at home just for companionship?
Big Brother wants your attention. Don’t give it to him.
And be careful as to what music you listen to. I cringe when I see young people with their earbuds in and a strange stare on their faces or slumped over in obvious depression. I can only imagine what rubbish their subjecting themselves to thinking it’s cool or OK cuz it’s some famous group or something iTunes is pushing. Music is programming, either good or bad.

Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Anglo-American 1957 Secret Plan to Assassinate the Syrian President. Déjà Vu?

At a time when the British press was still "reporting the truth", London's Guardian (27 September 2003) published a detailed report of a 1957 Anglo-American assassination plot directed against the Syrian president, with a view to implementing "regime change". The similarity to today's war on Syria is striking.

What is revealing is that the political assassination of the Syrian president has been on the Anglo-American drawing board for over half a century.
The article, which reviews the text of the leaked 'Secret Document", confirms that British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan and President Dwight D. Eisenhower had ordered the assassination of  the Syrian Head of State.
"Macmillan backed Syria assassination plot
Documents show White House and No 10 conspired over oil-fuelled invasion plan"
To consult the complete article by Ben Fenton, The Guardian, 27 September 2003 click here http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2003/sep/27/uk.syria1


The stated objective of this Secret Plan, entrusted to Britain's Secret Intelligence Service (SIS) [today's MI6] and the CIA, consisted in assassinating the Syrian president together with key political and military figures. "Mr Macmillan and President Eisenhower were left in no doubt about the need to assassinate the top men in Damascus."
 "In order to facilitate the action of liberative forces, reduce the capabilities of the Syrian regime to organise and direct its military actions, to hold losses and destruction to a minimum, and to bring about desired results in the shortest possible time, a special effort should be made to eliminate certain key individuals. Their removal should be accomplished early in the course of the uprising and intervention and in the light of circumstances existing at the time."  (The Guardian, 27 September 2003)
The stated pretext of the Macmillan-Eisenhower plan was that Syria was "spreading terrorism" and "preventing the West's access to Middle East oil"  Déjà Vu
The secret 1957 Plan called for the funding of a so-called "Free Syria Committee" equivalent to today's Syrian National Council (SNC).  It also involved  "the arming of "political factions with paramilitary or other actionist capabilities" within Syria. Under the plan, the CIA together with Britain's Secret Intelligence Serivce (SIS) "would instigate internal uprisings".
"Internal disturbances" in Syria would be triggered through covert operations. The "CIA is prepared, and SIS [MI6] will attempt, to mount minor sabotage and coup de main incidents [sic] within Syria, working through contacts with individuals."
An all out invasion plan had also been envisaged.

What was lacking from the 1957 plan, formulated at the height of the Cold War, was the "humanitarian" R2P envelope.

Moreover, in contrast to today's Free Syrian Army (FSA) (i.e the foot soldiers of the Western military alliance), the 1957 Anglo-American plan did not contemplate the recruitment of foreign mercenaries to wage their war:
[in 1957] Britain and America sought a secretive "regime change" in another Arab country they accused of spreading terror and threatening the west's oil supplies, by planning the invasion of Syria and the assassination of leading figures.
Newly discovered documents show how in 1957 Harold Macmillan and President Dwight Eisenhower approved a CIA-MI6 plan to stage fake border incidents as an excuse for an invasion by Syria's pro-western neighbours, and then to "eliminate" the most influential triumvirate in Damascus. (The Guardian, 27 September 2003)
...
The insidious plan was known to key political figures in the British government. It was made public 46 years later in 2003:
Although historians know that intelligence services had sought to topple the Syrian regime in the autumn of 1957, this is the first time any document has been found showing that the assassination of three leading figures was at the heart of the scheme. In the document drawn up by a top secret and high-level working group that met in Washington in September 1957, Mr Macmillan and President Eisenhower were left in no doubt about the need to assassinate the top men in Damascus.
Part of the "preferred plan" reads: "In order to facilitate the action of liberative forces, reduce the capabilities of the Syrian regime to organise and direct its military actions, to hold losses and destruction to a minimum, and to bring about desired results in the shortest possible time, a special effort should be made to eliminate certain key individuals. Their removal should be accomplished early in the course of the uprising and intervention and in the light of circumstances existing at the time."
The document, approved by London and Washington, named three men: Abd al-Hamid Sarraj, head of Syrian military intelligence; Afif al-Bizri, chief of the Syrian general staff; and Khalid Bakdash, leader of the Syrian Communist party.
For a prime minister who had largely come to power on the back of Anthony Eden's disastrous antics in Suez just a year before, Mr Macmillan was remarkably bellicose. He described it in his diary as "a most formidable report". Secrecy was so great, Mr Macmillan ordered the plan withheld even from British chiefs of staff, because of their tendency "to chatter".
...
Driving the call for action was the CIA's Middle East chief Kermit Roosevelt, grandson of former president Theodore Roosevelt. He identified Colonel Sarraj, General al-Bizri and Mr Bakdash as the real power behind a figurehead president. ...
The "preferred plan" adds: "Once a political decision is reached to proceed with internal disturbances in Syria, CIA is prepared, and SIS [MI6] will attempt, to mount minor sabotage and coup de main incidents within Syria, working through contacts with individuals.
"The two services should consult, as appropriate, to avoid any overlapping or interference with each other's activities... Incidents should not be concentrated in Damascus; the operation should not be overdone; and to the extent possible care should be taken to avoid causing key leaders of the Syrian regime to take additional personal protection measures."
The report said that once the necessary degree of fear had been created, frontier incidents and border clashes would be staged to provide a pretext for Iraqi and Jordanian military intervention. Syria had to be "made to appear as the sponsor of plots, sabotage and violence directed against neighbouring governments," the report says. "CIA and SIS should use their capabilities in both the psychological and action fields to augment tension." That meant operations in Jordan, Iraq, and Lebanon, taking the form of "sabotage, national conspiracies and various strong-arm activities" to be blamed on Damascus.
The plan called for funding of a "Free Syria Committee", and the arming of "political factions with paramilitary or other actionist capabilities" within Syria. The CIA and MI6 would instigate internal uprisings, for instance by the Druze in the south, help to free political prisoners held in the Mezze prison, and stir up the Muslim Brotherhood in Damascus.
The planners envisaged replacing the Ba'ath/Communist regime with one that was firmly anti-Soviet, but they conceded that this would not be popular and "would probably need to rely first upon repressive measures and arbitrary exercise of power". (Ben Fenton, The Guardian, 27 September 2003, emphasis added)
In contrast to the 2011-2012 Plan, which is supported by the Arab League, with the participation of Saudi Arabia and Qatar in covert ops., the 1957 Eisenhower Macmillan Plan was not carried due to lack of support by neighbouring Arab countries: "The plan was never used, chiefly because Syria's Arab neighbours could not be persuaded to take action and an attack from Turkey alone was thought to be unacceptable. (Ben Fenton, The Guardian, 27 September 2003, emphasis added)

The ongoing US-NATO aggression directed against Syria has been planned for several years.

An invasion of Syria was contemplated in the immediate wake of the 2003 Iraq invasion by US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.

"Regime change" in Damascus was again put forth by the Bush adminstration in the immediate wake of the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. The assassination was casully blamed, without evidence, on Damascus.

President George W. Bush  "denounced Syria and its ally, Iran, as 'outlaw regimes... Syria and Iran deserve no patience from the victims of terror,'" The British media confirmed in October 2005 that Washington was "looking for a pro-western replacement for Mr Assad."

 Global Research Articles by Michel Chossudovsky

Sunday, August 5, 2012

America

"I'm so sick of arming the world, then sending troops over to destroy the fucking arms, you know what I mean? We keep arming these little countries, then we go and blow the shit out of them. We're like the bullies of the world, y'know. We're like Jack Palance in the movie Shane, throwing the pistol at the sheepherder's feet.
"Pick it up."
"I don't wanna pick it up, Mister, you'll shoot me."
"Pick up the gun."
"Mister, I don't want no trouble. I just came downtown here to get some hard rock candy for my kids, some gingham for my wife. I don't even know what gingham is, but she goes through about ten rolls a week of that stuff. I ain't looking for no trouble, Mister."
"Pick up the gun."
(He picks it up. Three shots ring out.)
"You all saw him - he had a gun."

Friday, August 3, 2012

The War on Terror in numbers

The 9/11 attacks resulted in 2,996 casualties, which included 343 firefighters and 59 police officers who were in trying to save victims inside the World Trade Center. The War on Terror launched by George W. Bush Jr. has led to at least 227,000 people (more than 300,000 according to other estimates). This includes 116,657 civilians (51%) between 76  - 108,000 insurgents or Taliban Islamists (34% to 36%), 25,297 Iraqi and Afghan soldiers (11%), and 8,975 American, British, and other coalition forces (3.9%).

Based on the documents released by WikiLeaks, the Guardian estimated in October 2010, 109,032 civilians and soldiers were killed in Iraq between 2004 – 2009. This included 66,081 civilians, 23,984 enemy forces, 15,196 Iraqi soldiers, and 3,771 coalition troops.
Yet these statistics do not take into account that the deaths tolls were only from the coalition reports. icasualties.org has listed 4,770 coalition troops (4,452 American and 179 British) who have died in combat in Iraq since 2003, and 2,441 soldiers (1,566 American, 364 British, and 56 French) who died in Afghanistan since 2001.
It is worth mentioning the number of  pro-Saddam forces that died in Iraq: 16,595 security forces from the post-Saddam era, 1,764 private contractors, 1,002 Sons of Iraq, and between 38,778 and 70,278 other supporters of the regime.
In Afghanistan, there were 7,500 casualties from Afghan security forces – 200 were from the Northern Alliance, and more than 38,000 were either part of the Taliban or insurgents.

Civilians casualties in Iraq


During the War on Terror, civilians suffered the greatest number of deaths. The Iraq Body Count documented between 100 and 110,000 civilians who died violent deaths since 2003 (whereas WikiLeaks only mentions 15,000 civilian deaths in its WarLogs).
A study published in The Lancet medical journal estimated that there were 654,965 deaths between 2003 and 2006 – representing 2.5% of the Iraqi population. This would suggest that today the statistic would be updated to about 1,455,590 casualties.
If the figures published in The Lancet are controversial, the estimated number of victims from the Iraqi War could range from 100,000 to over one million.
According to the UN, in Afghanistan the number of civilians killed since 2006 would be “only” 9,759, of which 6,269 were killed by antigovernment forces, and 2,723 by coalition or regular army forces. Another 6,300 to 23,600 civilian deaths resulting directly or indirectly from the war between 2001 – 2003 should be added to this statistic.
The below video is an excerpt from the documentary Rethink Afghanistan by Robert Greenwald, known for his films on Fox News and the Bush Administration:




Just Foreign Policy - Morts irakiens dus a l'invasion U.S.

The cost of war

In total, the War on Terror has cost $1,283 billion since 2001. This money was used to fund three primary programs: Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and Operation Noble Eagle which strengthened military bases’ security (this last program was mainly conducted during the first years of the War on Terror).
The cost of the war correlates with the main two conflicts. The Iraqi withdrawal largely affected the budget – the cost declined from $142.1 billion to $95.5 billion between the 2008-2009 fiscal year. In 2010, the budget for Afghanistan surpassed that for Iraq.
The Iraq War has cost $806 billion, which is 64% of the total amount of the War on Terror. Afghanistan for its part has cost a total of $444 billion.

150,000 US soldiers still in combat

In the weeks after the 9/11 attack, Washington invaded Afghanistan with the consent of the UN Security Council (who created the International Security Assistance Forces in December 2001).  The number of American soldiers present was slowly increasing just until 2007. Afghanistan was not a priority, particularly in March 2003 during the beginning of the Iraq war. 150,000 soldiers were mobilized for the new initiative – 10 times more than those in Afghanistan.
In 2007, George W. Bush launched a massive surge of troops to end the bloody violence in the country. Between January to November, the number of troops went from 132,000 to 170,000. Between both Iraq and Afghanistan, there were 195,000 US troops on the ground – a number that would only be reached again in August 2009.
As a promise made on the campaign trail, Barack Obama announced the withdrawal of troops from Iraq. Yet between April 2009 and September 2010, the number of troops committed to the war went from 39,000 to 98,000 – roughly 2.5 times more. In June 2009, the situation reversed between the two countries – the number of troops in Afghanistan outnumbered those in Iraq, a consequence of the surge in Afghanistan and the withdrawal in Iraq.
This figures, however, are not reflective of reality. As featured on OWNI in November 2010 [FR], there is a rise of private military companies being contracted in Iraq and Afghanistan. These extra forces consist of about 207,553 troops (112,092 in Iraq and 95,461 in Afghanistan), which surpasses the 175,000 number of regular military troops (79,100 in Iraq and 95,900 in Afghanistan).

Thursday, August 2, 2012

Stunning Crimes of the Big Banks: Worse than Your Wildest Imagination

Source: Washington’s Blog

Preface:  Not all banks are criminal enterprises.  The wrongdoing of a particular bank cannot be attributed to other banks without proof.  But – as documented below – many of the biggest banks have engaged in unimaginably bad behavior.

You Won’t Believe What They’ve Done …
Here are just some of the improprieties by big banks:
  • Engaging in mafia-style big-rigging fraud against local governments. See thisthis and this
  • Shaving money off of virtually every pension transaction they handled over the course of decades, stealing collectively billions of dollars from pensions worldwide. Details hereherehereherehere,herehereherehereherehere and here
  • Pledging the same mortgage multiple times to different buyers. See thisthisthisthis and this. This would be like selling your car, and collecting money from 10 different buyers for the same car
  • Committing massive fraud in an $800 trillion dollar market which effects everything from mortgages, student loans, small business loans and city financing
  • Pushing investments which they knew were terrible, and then betting against the same investments to make money for themselves. See thisthisthisthis and this
  • Engaging in unlawful “Wash Trades” to manipulate asset prices. See thisthis and this
  • Participating in various Ponzi schemes. See thisthis and this
  • Bribing and bullying ratings agencies to inflate ratings on their risky investments
The executives of the big banks invariably pretend that the hanky-panky was only committed by a couple of low-level rogue employees. But studies show that most of the fraud is committed by management.
Indeed, one of the world’s top fraud experts – professor of law and economics, and former senior S&L regulator Bill Black – says that most financial fraud is “control fraud”, where the people who own the banks are the ones who implement systemic fraud. See thisthis and this.
But at least the big banks do good things for society, like loaning money to Main Street, right?
Actually:
  • The big banks have slashed lending since they were bailed out by taxpayers … while smaller banks have increased lending. See thisthis and this
We can almost understand why Thomas Jefferson warned:
And I sincerely believe, with you, that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies ….
John Adams said:
Banks have done  more injury to religion, morality, tranquillity, prosperity, and even wealth of the nation than they have done or ever will do good.
And Lord Acton argued:
The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the people versus the banks.